Tuesday, April 3, 2012
The questions continue, EqualLogic versus Lefthand HP P4500
Friday, March 9, 2012
Interesting post about HP versus Dell in the worldwide storage market
| ompany | 4Q11 Revenue | 4Q11 Market Share (%) | 4Q10 Revenue | 4Q10 Market Share (%) | 4Q10-4Q11 Change (%) |
| EMC1 | 1,937.2 | 32.7 | 1,602.0 | 28.3 | 20.9 |
| IBM | 977.3 | 16.5 | 984.4 | 17.4 | -0.7 |
| NetApp3 | 619.6 | 10.5 | 556.5 | 9.8 | 11.3 |
| Hitachi/HDS2 | 558.1 | 9.4 | 521.8 | 9.2 | 6.9 |
| HP | 555.6 | 9.4 | 581.1 | 10.3 | -4.4 |
| Dell | 417.0 | 7.0 | 411.4 | 7.3 | 1.4 |
Dell up 1.4 % with HP down -4.4, with Dell and HP pretty close in revenue.
Friday, July 15, 2011
HP LH 4000 versus Equallogic forum response
http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/72924-gah-lefthand-san-or-equallogic-any-thoughts?page=2#entry-830476
Friday, June 17, 2011
A case for VSA, lefthand or maybe someone elses?
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
LeftHand, how to write to a snapshot
I'm a relative newbie to working with the P4000s so I am cutting my teeth with the VSA appliance.
I am testing how snaphots work, and I have successfully taken and connected to the snapshot by adding in the new ISCSI name of the snapshotted volume in the windows iscsi initiator. I have assigned the server read/write access as well, and the disk is available in computer management etc. All good, however when i try to write a file to the snapshotted disk, I get an access denied error. I've done a google, and some folk say snapshots are read only, but I am confused by the fact that I can assign a server read/write to access to the snapshot, this implies that I should be able to write to it!
Have I done something wrong or is this the way it works. And if so, is there a sneaky way I can get write access to the snapshot?
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
A fairly unhappy LH customer
http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/140475-iscsi-virtual-appliances?page=1#entry-768652
HP P4000 is technically a software SAN (you can buy it as a license, and install it yourself). While they are the only VSA that supports VAAI, I would never deploy one again. Crazy things like it automatically creates a new target for every LUN, use of a single virtual IP for all targets, makes management a pain in the ass. GUI is slow as hell, and its an overpriced linux system that isn't that well built or supported (8 hours after I logged a critical ticket I got a voicemail at 10pm saying "hey we're kinda busy today, give us a call back tomr if your still down").
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Monday, August 16, 2010
Thursday, June 10, 2010
This is an interesting post from a LH user
Don't know what his final decision was, but it shows his decision making process.
Monday, September 28, 2009
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Monday, August 31, 2009
Interesting Post
http://thesantechnologist.com/?p=198
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
Recent LeftHand SAN post
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Data-Storage/HP-LeftHand-P4300-48TB-SAS-Starter-SAN-Solution-Builds-a-Strong-iSCSI-SAN-Foundation-804648/1/
The centralized management console announced that it was executing my tasks, the access lights started flashing on the drives, and then the console (and Java) crashed. After I rebooted the server, I was pleasantly surprised that there was no lasting damage from the crash. I launched the centralized management console and created a new iSCSI server. I was immediately able to access it from the Microsoft iSCSI Initiator on my Windows server.
(I can't believe he was happy with this!!!! )
This post had a similar expereince
http://windowsitpro.com/Windows/article/articleid/102478/hp-lefthand-p4300-48tb-sas-starter-san-solution.html
The only problem I ran into was that occasionally the console wouldn't start and I needed to terminate the javaw.exe process in Task Manager before restarting the console.
Anyways, in the Eweek article he liked the Idea of the architecture of the LeftHand SAN. He also received a dud of a unit, this is what he wrote.
The second server started, but failed to recognize the array controller and therefore didn’t boot completely.
Of course, the first thing I did then was take the server apart, at which point I noticed that the board containing the SAN/iQ software had fallen off of the P400 RAID controller—obviously a casualty of rough handling during shipping. Popping it back on did not solve the problem, but after an e-mail and a quick call, a new controller and a third server were on their way. After I installed the new controller, the server booted up smoothly.
Later on he ended up having a little bit of a support problem, he wrote
The only unpleasantness that I have to report is that it took tech support more than 48 hours to respond to an e-mail requesting access to the support Website. I think it is fair to say that any company that shells out $30K for storage will want access to the documentation within 48 minutes rather than 48 hours.
He was also unable to set up the SMTP for sending alerts to his email address.
He was impressed by the performance and by the management of the device.
Thursday, August 6, 2009
Equallogic growth looks good

According to this register article Equallogic growth looks pretty good!
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/07/30/compellent_q209_results/
Monday, August 3, 2009
LeftHand UI, take 2
http://windowsitpro.com/Windows/article/articleid/102478/hp-lefthand-p4300-48tb-sas-starter-san-solution.html
His take on the UI
The SAN/iQ software really sets this product in a class by itself and is the easiest SAN management software I've ever used. You don't need to be a storage expert or have to look up confusing storage terms like LUN Masking to configure the SAN. Instead, you use a series of easy-to-use wizards to perform the initial setup and configuration. You can rerun the wizards at any time.That is the sort of UI I am looking for! Someone should get him an EqualLogic box and see which he likes better :)
He actually attached a rare screen shot of the SAN/iQ software :)
His only complaintThe only problem I ran into was that occasionally the console wouldn't start and I needed to terminate the javaw.exe process in Task Manager before restarting the console.
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Just ran across this InfoTec document LeftHand Vs. EqualLogic
http://www.infotech.com/samples/LeftHand_vs_EqualLogic.pdf
Or here
Here are a couple of call outs.
Info-Tech has found that for those enterprises looking to acquire a clustered iSCSI solution, EqualLogic and LeftHand Networks are often in a dead heat. Both have similar price ranges and features. Both have benefitted from x86 server virtualization and continue to partner with VMware and others to enhance virtual infrastructures.
What usually tips the decision toward one or the other is a preference for how each implements storage clustering. EqualLogic’s storage units are more comprehensive while LeftHand Networks’ approach is more hardware agnostic and granular.
Then here is the crux
EqualLogic’s PS arrays have larger capacities as well as full hardware redundancy in each box. An enterprise can start with a single PS array and have a complete storage solution including capacity, management features, and hardware redundancy. EqualLogic often wins in a showdown with LeftHand because the buyers feel more comfortable with a full featured hardware solution ready to go out of the box.
LeftHand’s SAN/iQ makes an individual server into a building block for a storage solution. A single “brick” can serve as a storage target, but to achieve hardware redundancy at least two bricks are required. This increases the upfront cost of the entry level. On the plus side, SAN/iQ can run on a variety of industry standard servers as well as a virtual machine – entry level SAN functionality can be provided to a virtual infrastructure without buying additional hardware.
EqualLogic
With a year head start, Dell is further along in integrating EqualLogic into its products. Dell is making iSCSI a centerpiece of its storage offerings for mid-sized enterprises and EqualLogic PS-series products are the flagship. For example, when Dell rolled out new products for supporting virtual infrastructures in September 2008, the processing component was Dell server blades while the storage component was EqualLogic PS-series arrays. Dell also continues to sell more traditional storage arrays co-branded with EMC.
LeftHand
HP will be integrating LeftHand into its StorageWorks products. How LeftHand will fit into the overall strategy for HP is still a question mark. How will HP balance this new option – a server based clustered storage approach – against its existing traditional storage array business?
And the conclusion
Both vendors share in common a scalable clustered architecture, ease of installation and management, and a robust feature set. However, EqualLogic’s appeal is in providing a comprehensive solution in a hardware appliance. LeftHand’s strength is in providing a more agnostic basic building block for creating robust storage clusters. The software can even run on a VM to turn direct attached storage into a virtual SAN.
What does Information World think of EqualLogic and LeftHand
They wrote:
Long-time readers know that a Dell (Dell) iSCSI array currently lies at the heart of our virt lab. Our December wishes came true when Dell offered us not one, but two updated arrays just in time for the holidays.And then he wrote
We were able to add the two new devices to our existing EqualLogic SAN in a few minutes via the array management web interface. Dell's tools detected the new arrays, I entered IP and iSCSI info, and we ware ready to allocate the new raw storage in no time at all.Once again another plug for the simplicity and elegance of EqualLogic!The hardest part of adding 52.8 terabytes of storage to the lab? Unpacking the crates.
The most laborious? Inserting the 48 SATA drives and re-installing the 16 SAS drives.
I remember when setting up robust, complex storage solution used to be a multi-day exercise in masocism. Now it's an afternoon of straightforward, honest work.
In another post he talks about the coolness of using LeftHands VSA
http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2008/02/no_free_lunch.html;jsessionid=05AYVKJQXXCC0QSNDLRSKH0CJUNN2JVN?queryText=lefthand
The pitch: no physical SAN required 'cause the VSA reclaims 'unused' storage in ESX boxes as a SAN. I still think this is a novel approach for smaller shops to benefit from ESX; external storage arrays (Fibre Channel or iSCSI) can be scary to the uninitiated. Build up a couple ESX hosts, load them up with internal storage and let the SAN/IQ software magically create a virtual storage area network. I can't imagine you'd want to run the dataset for a large transactional system on the same box as your hosted VMs, but it would probably address an SMB's needs (the target market) with no fuss.
EqualLogic a good buy for Dell
EqualLogic sales are up 71% versus overall storage revenues down 17 % year on year (for dell)
Dell said that the EqualLogic storage business is now four times larger than when it was acquired in November 2007 for $1.4bn. At that time, EqualLogic was looking like a $100m/year revenue company, implying a $400m/year revenue run rate now.I haven't seen a similar post from HP but I have been searching for how the purchase of LH has gone for them.
This post kind of echoes my findings
With all the talk about FCoE and NFS it seems that iSCSI has become the odd man out. All reports indicate that Dell continues to do well with the EqualLogic acquisition but what Hewlett-Packard is doing with its LeftHand Networks purchase remains unclear. Don’t count iSCSI out yet, though -- companies are planning iSCSI storage solutions aimed right at the SME market.
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Spiceworks EqualLogic versus LeftHand thread
http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/72924
It's pretty interesting!
ESRP Equallogic Versus Lefthand
http://sites.google.com/site/mellerbeck/Home/ESRPLeftHand_saniq_50000_user_exchange2007_091707.pdf?attredirects=0
And an equallogic ESRP doc
http://sites.google.com/site/mellerbeck/Home/ESRP-EqualLogic-PS5000XV-90000-Users..pdf?attredirects=0
Of course as this post mentions, ESRP reports are not really meant to compare systems.
http://blogs.netapp.com/shadeofblue/2008/10/lumpy-dell-and.html